Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCadman, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorMaraseni, Tek
dc.contributor.authorMa, Hwan Ok
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Casero, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T07:07:31Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T07:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1389-9341
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/100857
dc.description.abstractForest ecosystems worldwide are increasingly subjected to human intervention, leading commentators to argue that forests should be viewed as anthropogenic ecosystems. REDD+ is an emerging inter-governmental policy instrument aimed at both reducing deforestation and forest degradation and combatting climate change, whereby developed countries pay developing countries to reduce their forest-based emissions. The paper details a five-year research project to evaluate REDD+ quality of governance and develop governance standards for the mechanism. Quality of governance was evaluated in five key international institutional elements: the REDD + related negotiations in the global climate talks; the support and funding agencies UN-REDD, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), Forest Investment Programme (FIP) and the REDD + Partnership. This research was complemented by national level governance assessments and related standards setting initiatives in Nepal and Papua New Guinea. The researchers conclude that REDD+ confronts a number of challenges, notably around resources for capacity building, and benefit sharing. In addition, the lack of provisions for changing behaviour and solving the problem of forest-based emissions in the current safeguards render them inadequate to the task of delivering quality of governance. In the absence of consistent governance standards, REDD + will only partially be successful in combatting climate change in the Anthropocene.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom8
dc.relation.ispartofpageto16
dc.relation.ispartofjournalForest Policy and Economics
dc.relation.ispartofvolume79
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCorporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagement
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchForestry Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchApplied Economics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPolicy and Administration
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode150303
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode050205
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode0705
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1402
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1605
dc.titleFive years of REDD+ governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCadman, Timothy M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record