Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBellet, R Nicole
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Rebecca L
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Lewis
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Norman R
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-28T01:13:07Z
dc.date.available2017-11-28T01:13:07Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1932-7501
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HCR.0000000000000131
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/101620
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Home-based and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) have demonstrated similar levels of risk factor reduction. Cardiac rehabilitation models with fewer exercise sessions may be as effective as traditional models. This study reviewed a community phase II CR database from 2007 to 2010. METHODS: A fast-track CR (FTCR) group was introduced alongside an existing traditional CR (TCR) program. The 2 programs ran concurrently on different days. Both FTCR and TCR treatment groups undertook supervised low to moderate intensity exercise training for 6 weeks and were provided with home exercise advice. Fast-track CR included once-weekly exercise sessions and a 1-time 7-hour education session; TCR included twice-weekly exercise and education sessions. Similar education was provided in both programs. Six-minute walk test distance (6MWD) was assessed pre-CR and post-CR for both groups. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty patients enrolled in CR during the period, and patients elected or were assigned (not randomized) to FTCR (n = 197) or to TCR (n = 423) treatment groups. Complete 6MWD data sets were available for 115 FTCR and 254 TCR subjects. Repeated-measures analysis of variance found 6MWD outcomes to be similar for both groups over both assessments combined and at each assessment point. Improvements in 6MWD post-CR were different for men and women in the CR database (8% vs 5%, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Six-minute walk test distance outcomes were not different for subjects undergoing once-weekly or twice-weekly supervised CR exercise sessions. CR models with fewer supervised exercise sessions may provide similar functional outcomes to traditional CR models.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom417
dc.relation.ispartofpageto422
dc.relation.ispartofissue6
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
dc.relation.ispartofvolume35
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110299
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1102
dc.titleSix-minute walk test distances in fast-track and traditional cardiac rehabilitation: A 3-year database review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMorris, Norman
gro.griffith.authorAdams, Lewis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record