Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray, Georginaen_US
dc.contributor.editorSusan Oakley,Jason Pudsey,Julie Henderson,Debra King, Ross Boyden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T14:20:50Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T14:20:50Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.modified2007-10-29T04:56:59Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/1124
dc.description.abstractInterlocking directorates (that is, the links created by a director who is on board of more than one company or organization) are compared between two countries, Australia and New Zealand, and within countries by ownership. This article takes the top thirty companies of both countries to look at differences between their patterns of interlocking in 1998. The key finding is that the interlocks reveal a secondary productive capital political power layer but underneath this is a first tier of power, belonging to finance capital. The ownership of top companies in Australia and particularly in New Zealand is primarily in the hands of nominee companies owned by finance capital.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent149432 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherThe Australian Sociological Associationen_US
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.tasa.org.au/conference/en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofbookorjournalThe Australian Sociological Association 2000 Conference: Sociological Sites/Sightsen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameThe Australian Sociological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleThe Australian Sociological Association 2000 Conference: Sociological Sites/Sightsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2000-12-06en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2000-12-08en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationAdelaideen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode410000en_US
dc.titleInterlocking Directorates: Australian and New Zealand Comparisonsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciencesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright remains with the author 2006 Griffith University. The attached file is reproduced here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this conference please refer to The Australian Sociological Association's (TASA) website or contact the author.en_AU
gro.date.issued2000
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record