Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWatson, K. K.
dc.contributor.authorSardana, V. A.
dc.contributor.authorSander, Graham
dc.contributor.editorJ. E. Nash
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-26T23:03:33Z
dc.date.available2019-05-26T23:03:33Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.issn00221694
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0022-1694(94)02580-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/120289
dc.description.abstractResults using a recent analytical solution for constant flux infiltration are compared with those obtained from using a well-established numerical approach. For the three cases considered excellent agreement is obtained. However, it is also noted that not all forms of the analytical conductivity function are well suited to numerical simulation due to the asymptotic nature of the particular derived soil-water characteristic at the lower water content end of the scale.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom101
dc.relation.ispartofpageto112
dc.relation.ispartofissue1-4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Hydrology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume165
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMathematical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode01
dc.titleComparison of Analytical and Numerical Results for Constant Flux Infiltration
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorSander, Graham C.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record