Television and Civilisation: The Unity of Opposites?
Author(s)
Keane, Michael
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
1999
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper examines the manner by which the Chinese Communist Party has moved to allow cultural producers more autonomy. I argue that such a shift in government rationality needs to be viewed as part of wider reform programmes and strategies intended to promote diversity and make institutions more accountable and efficient. The interface between culture and the market in contemporary China is often described as a tension between commercialism and propaganda, or simply a trend towards pluralism, but with ‘Chinese characteristics’. I argue that it is more useful to view the relations between culture and government as accommodation ...
View more >This paper examines the manner by which the Chinese Communist Party has moved to allow cultural producers more autonomy. I argue that such a shift in government rationality needs to be viewed as part of wider reform programmes and strategies intended to promote diversity and make institutions more accountable and efficient. The interface between culture and the market in contemporary China is often described as a tension between commercialism and propaganda, or simply a trend towards pluralism, but with ‘Chinese characteristics’. I argue that it is more useful to view the relations between culture and government as accommodation and compromise. Cultural policy statements are often deliberately ambiguous and relations between officials and producers are continually being redefined. I suggest that a Foucauldian notion of governmentality can provide the methodological tools to understand the complexity of quasi-commercialized culture in China. A reading of cultural policy statements pertaining to television drama production will illustrate my argument.
View less >
View more >This paper examines the manner by which the Chinese Communist Party has moved to allow cultural producers more autonomy. I argue that such a shift in government rationality needs to be viewed as part of wider reform programmes and strategies intended to promote diversity and make institutions more accountable and efficient. The interface between culture and the market in contemporary China is often described as a tension between commercialism and propaganda, or simply a trend towards pluralism, but with ‘Chinese characteristics’. I argue that it is more useful to view the relations between culture and government as accommodation and compromise. Cultural policy statements are often deliberately ambiguous and relations between officials and producers are continually being redefined. I suggest that a Foucauldian notion of governmentality can provide the methodological tools to understand the complexity of quasi-commercialized culture in China. A reading of cultural policy statements pertaining to television drama production will illustrate my argument.
View less >
Journal Title
International Journal of Cultural Studies
Volume
2
Issue
2
Subject
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
Studies in Creative Arts and Writing
Language, Communication and Culture