Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerns, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T04:58:53Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T04:58:53Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn00651915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/120645
dc.description.abstractDespite the iconic status of 'the family' in contemporary legal and political culture, 'family' is, increasingly, a slippery signifier. The archetypal family form is almost an anachronism, a vanished icon of an earlier age. Defended with increasing vehemence by traditionalist forces, including militant fathers' rights groups, it achieves its potency as an ideal against which contemporary family forms can be found sorely wanting.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAdelaide Law Review Association
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.publisher.urihttps://law.adelaide.edu.au/adelaide-law-review
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom19
dc.relation.ispartofpageto50
dc.relation.ispartofissue1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAdelaide Law Review
dc.relation.ispartofvolume21
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.titleThe ties that (no longer) bind: tension and contradiction in family law
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBerns, Sandra S.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record