Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T05:38:09Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T05:38:09Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.issn0313-0096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/121577
dc.description.abstractThe Anunga guidelines attempt to regulate the conduct of police during their interrogation of Aboriginal suspects, with an aim to remove or obviate some of the disadvantages from which Aboriginal people suffer in their dealings with police. The guidelines of Anunga are critically examined, considering the implementation of four of its guidelines along with comments on the difficulties that have arisen in relation to the existing requirements.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherStar Printery
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom27
dc.relation.ispartofpageto54
dc.relation.ispartofissue1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
dc.relation.ispartofvolume21
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.titleThe Cultural Specificity of Evidence: The Current Scope and Relevance of the Anunga Guidelines
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorDouglas, Heather A.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record