Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacNeil, William
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T04:33:40Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T04:33:40Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn13200968
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13200968.1999.11077313
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/122343
dc.description.abstractIn one of the most suggestive asides in Great Expectations, Joe Gargery, the novel's moral centre (and, as it turns out, most perspicacious critic) says of his formidable wife, Mrs. Joe: 'Your sister is given to government'. This remark, as Joe himself might exclaim, is 'astonishing', precisely because it anticipates and even underwrites a certain critical (legal) reading of Great Expectations, one indebted to that great theorist of 'governmentality', Michel Foucault. Now, only recently, a fine and full Foucauldian reading of Great Expectations has been assayed: namely, Jeremy Tambling's 'Prison-Bound: Dickens and Foucault'. Tambling makes a strong case for a 'Foucauldian Dickens', meticulously cataloguing the disciplinary devices (the Prison, the panoptical gaze, the carceral society) and punishment motifs (fantasies of guilt and shame) which saturate, indeed oversaturate Great Expectations. In stressing, however, Foucault's earlier project of discipline and punish,Tambling ends up inadvertently reproducing, albeit within a much more sophisticated theoretical frame, the historicist insights and observations of an earlier generation of scholarship on Dickens and the law: for example, Philip Collins on the Prison; Humphrey House on Bentham; and the Leavises on guilt and shame. In this article, I want to break this cycle of critical repetition (which mimics the repetitions, doublings and foldings-in of the narrative), and shift the debate away from standard socio-legal discussions of Dickens- be they old historicist or early Foucauldian-, and towards what I take to be the key historical, political and, especially, jurisprudential issue of Great Expectations: specifically, the emergence of 'governmentality' in Victorian society, political economy and law.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAustralian Feminist Law Foundation
dc.publisher.placeParkville, Vic
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom98
dc.relation.ispartofpageto118
dc.relation.ispartofissue1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Feminist Law Journal
dc.relation.ispartofvolume13
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminology
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCultural Studies
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1602
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode2002
dc.titleBeyond Governmentality: Retributive, Distributive and Deconstructive Justice in 'Great Expectations'
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorMacNeil, William P.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record