18F-FDG PET/CT as a semiquantitative imaging marker in HPV-p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers
Author(s)
Huang, Yu-Ting
Kumar, Aravind S Ravi
Bhuta, Sandeep
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: There is evidence that the status of human papilloma virus subtype 16 (HPV-p16) alters the prognosis of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OSCC). We sought to establish whether there is a relationship between HPV-p16 status and 18F-FDG uptake in the prognosis of OSCC.
Materials and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed OSCC at our institution between June 2011 and June 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a baseline 18F-FDG PET/computed tomographic scan and HPV-p16 testing. Tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and total ...
View more >Purpose: There is evidence that the status of human papilloma virus subtype 16 (HPV-p16) alters the prognosis of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OSCC). We sought to establish whether there is a relationship between HPV-p16 status and 18F-FDG uptake in the prognosis of OSCC. Materials and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed OSCC at our institution between June 2011 and June 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a baseline 18F-FDG PET/computed tomographic scan and HPV-p16 testing. Tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and total glycolytic activity (TGA) [defined as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) multiplied by SUVmean] were measured. All PET/computed tomographic scans were reviewed on a Siemens Syngo.via (version VA11B_HF03) workstation. A designated operator defined the region of the primary tumour with the MTV segmented by 40% of the SUVmax fixed threshold method. Results: Seventy-nine patients aged 27–84 years met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The types of primary tumour were tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in 48% and base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma in 29%. The mean SUVmax was 17.5 and 17.7 in HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative groups, respectively (P=0.90). The mean MTV was 8.36 and 7.07 ml in HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative patients, respectively (P=0.42). The mean TGA values were 96.3 and 82.5 g among the HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative patients (P=0.54). There was no significant difference between HPV-p16 status and tumour grading for any of the imaging markers. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences between HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative OSCC for any of the metabolic imaging markers (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TGA) measured in this study.
View less >
View more >Purpose: There is evidence that the status of human papilloma virus subtype 16 (HPV-p16) alters the prognosis of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OSCC). We sought to establish whether there is a relationship between HPV-p16 status and 18F-FDG uptake in the prognosis of OSCC. Materials and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed OSCC at our institution between June 2011 and June 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a baseline 18F-FDG PET/computed tomographic scan and HPV-p16 testing. Tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and total glycolytic activity (TGA) [defined as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) multiplied by SUVmean] were measured. All PET/computed tomographic scans were reviewed on a Siemens Syngo.via (version VA11B_HF03) workstation. A designated operator defined the region of the primary tumour with the MTV segmented by 40% of the SUVmax fixed threshold method. Results: Seventy-nine patients aged 27–84 years met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The types of primary tumour were tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in 48% and base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma in 29%. The mean SUVmax was 17.5 and 17.7 in HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative groups, respectively (P=0.90). The mean MTV was 8.36 and 7.07 ml in HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative patients, respectively (P=0.42). The mean TGA values were 96.3 and 82.5 g among the HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative patients (P=0.54). There was no significant difference between HPV-p16 status and tumour grading for any of the imaging markers. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences between HPV-p16-positive and HPV-p16-negative OSCC for any of the metabolic imaging markers (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TGA) measured in this study.
View less >
Journal Title
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Volume
36
Issue
1
Subject
Clinical sciences
Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified