Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuhig, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGunasekara, Imani
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Susan
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14T01:00:48Z
dc.date.available2019-02-14T01:00:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1365-2524en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hsc.12269en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/125066
dc.description.abstractInpatient care is integral to balanced mental health systems, contributing to containment of risk associated with psychiatric crises and affording opportunities for treatment. However, psychiatric wards are not always safe and service users are often dissatisfied with the experience. Hence, and because inpatient care is the most costly component of mental health systems, minimising duration of admission and reducing risk of readmission are clinical and strategic priorities internationally. With (primarily quantitative) research to date focused on explaining readmission in terms of characteristics of individuals and services, understanding of the ‘revolving door phenomenon’ remains limited. Considering verstehen critical to addressing this messy problem, we examined readmission from the service users’ perspective. Using grounded theory techniques, we inductively analysed data from interviews with 13 people readmitted to inpatient care within 28 days of discharge. Participants, including eight men, were recruited in 2013 from three psychiatric wards at a metropolitan hospital in Australia. Analysis supported description of readmission as a process, fundamentally related to insufficiency of internal, interpersonal and/or environmental resources to maintain community tenure. For the people in this study, admission to hospital was either the default coping mechanism or the culmination of counter‐productive attempts to manage stressful circumstances. Readmission can appropriately be understood as one representation of a fundamental social malaise and the struggle of some people to survive in an apparently inhospitable world. The findings indicate that neither locating the ‘problem of readmission’ within an individual and promoting self‐governance/self‐control/self‐regulation, nor identifying failures of specific services or sectors are likely to support the economic and ethical imperative of reducing psychiatric admissions. The findings of the study and limitations related to its conduct in a particular setting provide fertile ground for further research and design of interventions to break the readmission cycle. However, balanced, mental health services alone are insufficient; systems of care must become ‘recovery oriented’.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto8en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHealth and Social Care in the Communityen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPsychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode179999en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding readmission to psychiatric hospital in Australia from the service users' perspective: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.description.notepublicThis publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.en_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record