Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorPeter J. Moss and Rajesh, P. Dhakalen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Carliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuan, Hongen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Junen_US
dc.contributor.editorPeter J. Moss and Rajesh, P. Dhakalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:09:46Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:09:46Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.modified2007-08-06T02:26:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/13391
dc.description.abstractCurrently the wall panel design equations given in the Australian Standard and the American Institute Code give no guidelines for the inclusion of side restraints, openings, or for a slenderness ratio (H/t) greater than 32. Empirical formulae have been derived based upon limited test data, in which the size and location of openings are accounted for with a dimensionless alpha parameter (?). In this study the Layered Finite Element Method (LFEM) is used to undertake three parametric studies investigating the influence of opening size, length and height on the ultimate load and deflection of wall panels performing in one-way and two-way action. A total of 20 wall models with varying opening configurations are analysed. Comparisons of the numerical results to established formula for walls with openings validated the accuracy of the LFEM predictions. Results indicate that increasing the height together with the length of the opening has the most critical effect, decreasing the axial strength ratio to different degrees for one-way and two-way walls with an increase in opening size. Increasing only the length of the opening also significantly decreases the axial strength ratio. Increasing only the opening height has little impact on the ultimate load capacity. Walls analysed in two-way action have an increased strength compared to the one-way counterparts due to the provision of side restraints, however such improved strength becomes insignificant for large sized openings. To ensure safe design, the combined effects of increasing both the height and length of an opening should be incorporated into the alpha parameter formula.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.publisher.placeLondonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameProceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materialsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleProgress in Mechanics of Structures and Materialsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2006-11-29en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2006-12-01en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationChristchurch, New Zealanden_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode290801en_US
dc.titleUltimate Load Behaviour of Concrete Wall Panels with Varying Opening Configurationsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Engineeringen_US
gro.date.issued2006
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record