• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Citation practices of the Australian law reform commission in final reports 1992-2012

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    102491_1.pdf (1.224Mb)
    Author
    Tranter, Kieran
    Year published
    2015
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    For 40 years, the Australian Law Reform Commission ('ALRC') has been a highly visible feature of the Australian legal landscape. It has endured through changing governments, and changing social and political contexts, and has forged a national and international reputation as a leading institutional law reform agency. While the ALRC and other institutional law reform agencies do many things, their primary activity, and the one that they are most judged on, are their reports, particularly final reports.For 40 years, the Australian Law Reform Commission ('ALRC') has been a highly visible feature of the Australian legal landscape. It has endured through changing governments, and changing social and political contexts, and has forged a national and international reputation as a leading institutional law reform agency. While the ALRC and other institutional law reform agencies do many things, their primary activity, and the one that they are most judged on, are their reports, particularly final reports.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    University of New South Wales Law Review
    Volume
    38
    Issue
    1
    Publisher URI
    http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/issue/volume-38-no-1
    Copyright Statement
    © 2015 University of New South Wales. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Use hypertext link to access the journal's website.
    Subject
    Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/134799
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Social media

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    First peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane
    • Australia