Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCrisp, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorSadler, Royce
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Kerri-Lee
dc.contributor.authorBuckridge, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorWills, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Christine
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Jan
dc.contributor.authorDalton, Helen
dc.contributor.authorLe Lievre, Kerrie
dc.contributor.authorBrougham, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T23:32:19Z
dc.date.available2019-02-25T23:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/134865
dc.description.abstractSummative peer review of teaching has the ability to improve both the status and the quality of teaching at tertiary level, by encouraging the promotion of exceptional teachers and academics engaged in the scholarship of teaching at all levels. The project aimed to: >> create a robust summative peer review process with the potential to foster and acknowledge excellent teaching and learning in Australian universities, particularly by being integrated with the promotion process; >> establish tools and protocols for the external peer review of teaching; and >> articulate ground rules and principles for a sustainable, effective and customisable process of internal and external peer review of teaching. Rigorous and adaptable protocols, processes and tools were developed for Internal Peer Review of Teaching (focussing on peer observation of classroom teaching) and External Peer Review of Teaching (focussing on peer evaluation of written materials and documentation). These were grounded in a thorough review of the literature around summative peer review of teaching, and trialled in pilot programs over two years. Feedback was collected from participants after each pilot program and used to modify and refine all documentation. For a summative peer review of teaching program to be successful, peer reviewers must be trained and experienced. A set of professional development resources for Internal and External Peer Review Team members was therefore developed, including model session agendas, video clips of classroom teaching, and sample promotion applications.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAustralian Learning & Teaching Council
dc.publisher.placeLead institution: University of Adelaide
dc.publisher.urihttp://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/109809
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1
dc.relation.ispartofpageto20
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHigher Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130103
dc.titlePeer Review of Teaching for Promotion Purposes: a project to develop and implement a pilot program of external Peer Review of Teaching at four Australian universities
dc.typeReport
dc.type.descriptionU2 - Reviews/Reports
dc.type.codeD - Reviews/Reports [DO NOT USE]
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/au/
dc.description.versionVersion of Record (VoR)
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, Griffith Institute of Higher Education
gro.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2009. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AU), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a licence identical to this one.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorKrause, Kerri-Lee D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Reports
    Contains reports by Griffith authors published for government agencies, industry and other organisations.

Show simple item record