• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Book chapters
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Deprivation of Liberty under Scrutiny

    Author(s)
    Nesossi, Elisa
    Biddulph, Sarah
    Sapio, Flora
    Trevaskes, Sue
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Trevaskes, Sue E.
    Year published
    2016
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Since the early 1980s, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has embarked on a dramatic and ongoing experiment with legal and institutional reform (gaige). The aim has been the creation of an efficient and modern justice system, responsive to social and economic change and proactive in protecting the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) hold on political power. This has meant that over approximately three decades, the topic of reform has also served as the thematic cornerstone of academic analyses in the field of Chinese law and justice. While a number of studies have developed conceptual paradigms – the ‘rule of law’ most notably ...
    View more >
    Since the early 1980s, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has embarked on a dramatic and ongoing experiment with legal and institutional reform (gaige). The aim has been the creation of an efficient and modern justice system, responsive to social and economic change and proactive in protecting the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) hold on political power. This has meant that over approximately three decades, the topic of reform has also served as the thematic cornerstone of academic analyses in the field of Chinese law and justice. While a number of studies have developed conceptual paradigms – the ‘rule of law’ most notably – to explain trajectories about ‘law’s empire’ in China (Peerenboom 2002; Lubman 2012), others have assessed reformist processes through empirical case studies (Balme and Dowdle 2009; Woo and Gallagher 2012). In this context, though, scholarly work on recent changes to the institutions that administer deprivation of liberty has visibly lagged behind.
    View less >
    Book Title
    Legal Reforms and Deprivation of Liberty in Contemporary China
    Publisher URI
    https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317106067/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315592091-1
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592091
    Subject
    Criminology not elsewhere classified
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/143197
    Collection
    • Book chapters

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander