Multilevel Leadership for Assessment for Learning, and the Potential of Critical Friendship
Author(s)
Swaffield, Sue
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2016
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Assessment for Learning (AfL) is distinguished through definitions, practices, principles, and associated characteristics. AfL is claimed to have the potential to improve student achievement, both in terms of attainment as measured by tests and in the skills and dispositions of learning how to learn, but it has proved difficult to establish and embed in practice. Leadership at all levels – state, school, and classroom – is required. The five principles of Leadership for Learning (LfL), which can be summarised as a focus on learning, conditions for learning, dialogue, shared leadership, and a shared sense of accountability, ...
View more >Assessment for Learning (AfL) is distinguished through definitions, practices, principles, and associated characteristics. AfL is claimed to have the potential to improve student achievement, both in terms of attainment as measured by tests and in the skills and dispositions of learning how to learn, but it has proved difficult to establish and embed in practice. Leadership at all levels – state, school, and classroom – is required. The five principles of Leadership for Learning (LfL), which can be summarised as a focus on learning, conditions for learning, dialogue, shared leadership, and a shared sense of accountability, provide a framework for considering the implementation of AfL at different levels across the education system. The four countries of the United Kingdom illustrate different approaches to national leadership of AfL. Critical friendship has been applied in many contexts and its similarity with the principles and practices of both AfL and LfL suggest it is appropriate for supporting the distributed leadership of assessment for learning. A key feature of critical friendship is questioning, and a set of questions related to each of the five LfL principles is offered in relation to leading AfL at the classroom, school, and country levels.
View less >
View more >Assessment for Learning (AfL) is distinguished through definitions, practices, principles, and associated characteristics. AfL is claimed to have the potential to improve student achievement, both in terms of attainment as measured by tests and in the skills and dispositions of learning how to learn, but it has proved difficult to establish and embed in practice. Leadership at all levels – state, school, and classroom – is required. The five principles of Leadership for Learning (LfL), which can be summarised as a focus on learning, conditions for learning, dialogue, shared leadership, and a shared sense of accountability, provide a framework for considering the implementation of AfL at different levels across the education system. The four countries of the United Kingdom illustrate different approaches to national leadership of AfL. Critical friendship has been applied in many contexts and its similarity with the principles and practices of both AfL and LfL suggest it is appropriate for supporting the distributed leadership of assessment for learning. A key feature of critical friendship is questioning, and a set of questions related to each of the five LfL principles is offered in relation to leading AfL at the classroom, school, and country levels.
View less >
Book Title
Leadership in Diverse Learning Contexts
Subject
Educational Administration, Management and Leadership