Analog of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality for steering

View/ Open
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Cavalcanti, Eric G
Foster, Christopher J
Fuwa, Maria
Wiseman, Howard M
Year published
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality and its permutations are necessary and sufficient criteria for Bell nonlocality in the simplest Bell-nonlocality scenario: two parties, two measurements per party and two outcomes per measurement. Here we derive an inequality for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR)-steering that is an analog of the CHSH, in that it is necessary and sufficient in this same scenario. However, since in the case of steering the device at Bob’s site must be specified (as opposed to the Bell case, in which it is a black box), the scenario we consider is that where Alice performs two (black-box) dichotomic ...
View more >The Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality and its permutations are necessary and sufficient criteria for Bell nonlocality in the simplest Bell-nonlocality scenario: two parties, two measurements per party and two outcomes per measurement. Here we derive an inequality for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR)-steering that is an analog of the CHSH, in that it is necessary and sufficient in this same scenario. However, since in the case of steering the device at Bob’s site must be specified (as opposed to the Bell case, in which it is a black box), the scenario we consider is that where Alice performs two (black-box) dichotomic measurements, and Bob performs two mutually unbiased qubit measurements. We show that this inequality is strictly weaker than the CHSH, as expected, and use it to decide whether a recent experiment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130401 (2013) [CrossRef] ] involving a single-photon split between two parties has demonstrated EPR-steering.
View less >
View more >The Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality and its permutations are necessary and sufficient criteria for Bell nonlocality in the simplest Bell-nonlocality scenario: two parties, two measurements per party and two outcomes per measurement. Here we derive an inequality for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR)-steering that is an analog of the CHSH, in that it is necessary and sufficient in this same scenario. However, since in the case of steering the device at Bob’s site must be specified (as opposed to the Bell case, in which it is a black box), the scenario we consider is that where Alice performs two (black-box) dichotomic measurements, and Bob performs two mutually unbiased qubit measurements. We show that this inequality is strictly weaker than the CHSH, as expected, and use it to decide whether a recent experiment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130401 (2013) [CrossRef] ] involving a single-photon split between two parties has demonstrated EPR-steering.
View less >
Journal Title
Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics
Volume
32
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© Optical Society of America, 2015. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modifications of the content of this paper are prohibited.
Subject
Quantum information, computation and communication
Foundations of quantum mechanics
Electrical engineering
Atomic, molecular and optical physics
Quantum physics