Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarry, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorWailes, Nicken_US
dc.contributor.editorFelicity Lamm, Erling Rasmussen, Rupert Tipplesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T12:53:28Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T12:53:28Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.modified2008-02-21T04:15:55Z
dc.identifier.issn01100637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/15379
dc.description.abstractLabour market regulation in Australia and New Zealand has proceeded along a similar trajectory, sometimes intersecting and other times appearing to take divergent paths. Interest in comparing both systems of labour market regulation peaked in the 1980s and early 1990s when there was a marked divergence. The structural divergence was highlighted by the abolition of compulsory arbitration and the introduction of the Employment Contracts Act in New Zealand. Since the early 1990s, there has been a re-convergence in the structures of labour market regulation. This re-convergence highlights a need to revisit the Australia-New Zealand comparison. This paper seeks to re-conceptualise the comparison by highlighting some of the limitations of the existing comparative literature and developing a broader framework that examines both the structures of labour market regulation and the functions that labour market institutions perform. In doing so, and in keeping with the earlier comparative literature, it seeks to contribute to the theoretical matrix within which cross-national industrial relations research is conducted.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent79839 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherER publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeAucklanden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.nzjournal.org/en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto17en_US
dc.relation.ispartofeditionOct 2005en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNew Zealand Journal of Employment Relationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume30en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode350203en_US
dc.titleRevisiting the Australia-New Zealand Comparisonen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, Dept of Employment Relations and Human Resourcesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2005 ER Publishing. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.en_AU
gro.date.issued2005
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record