Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKainz, Hans
dc.contributor.authorCarty, Christopher P
dc.contributor.authorModenese, Luca
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Roslyn N
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, David G
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T22:43:22Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T22:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0268-0033
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/154936
dc.description.abstractBackground: Inaccuracies in locating the three-dimensional position of the hip joint centre affect the calculated hip and knee kinematics, force- and moment-generating capacity of muscles and hip joint mechanics, which can lead to incorrect interpretations and recommendations in gait analysis. Several functional and predictive methods have been developed to estimate the hip joint centre location, and the International Society of Biomechanics recommends a functional approach for use with participants that have adequate range of motion at the hip, and predictive methods in those with insufficient range of motion. The purpose of the current systematic review was to substantiate the International Society of Biomechanics recommendations. This included identifying the most accurate functional and predictive methods, and defining ‘adequate’ range of motion. Methods: A systematic search with broad search terms was performed including five databases. Findings: The systematic search yielded to 801 articles, of which 34 papers were included. Eleven different predictive and 13 different functional methods were identified. The results showed that the geometric sphere fit method and Harrington equations are the most accurate functional and predictive approaches respectively that have been evaluated in vivo. Interpretation: In regard to the International Society of Biomechanics recommendations, the geometric sphere fit method should be used in people with sufficient active hip range of motion and the Harrington equations should be used in patients without sufficient hip range of motion. Multi-plane movement trials with at least 60° of flexion–extension and 30° of ab-adduction range of motion are suggested when using functional methods.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.placeElsevier Properties S.A
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom319
dc.relation.ispartofpageto329
dc.relation.ispartofissue4
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Biomechanics
dc.relation.ispartofvolume30
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiomedical engineering
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMechanical engineering
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4003
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4017
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode4207
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode420799
dc.titleEstimation of the hip joint centre in human motion analysis: A systematic review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Allied Health Sciences
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorCarty, Chris P.
gro.griffith.authorLloyd, David
gro.griffith.authorModenese, Luca
gro.griffith.authorKainz, Hans


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record