Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPapaspyridakos, Panagiotis
dc.contributor.authorMokti, Muizzaddin
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chun-Jung
dc.contributor.authorI. Benic, Goran
dc.contributor.authorO. Gallucci, German
dc.contributor.authorChronopoulos, Vasileios
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T04:33:12Z
dc.date.available2019-03-06T04:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/163480
dc.description.abstractBackground: The treatment of mandibular edentulism with implant fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) is a routinely used treatment option. Purpose: The study aims to report the implant and prosthodontic survival rates associated with IFCDPs for the edentulous mandible after an observation period of a minimum 5 years. Materials and Methods: An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled clinical trials and prospective studies with IFCDPs for the edentulous mandible. Clinical studies with at least 5-year follow-up were selected. Pooled data were statistically analyzed and cumulative implant- and prosthesis survival rates were calculated by meta-analysis, regression, and chi-square statistics. Implant-related and prosthesis-related factors were identified and their impact on survival rates was assessed. Results: Seventeen prospective studies, including 501 patients and 2,827 implants, were selected for meta-analysis. The majority of the implants (88.5% of all placed implants) had been placed in the interforaminal area. Cumulative implant survival rates for rough surface ranged from 98.42% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.98-98.86) (5 years) to 96.86% (95% CI: 96.00-97.73) (10 years); smooth surface implant survival rates ranged from 98.93% (95% CI: 98.38-99.49) (5 years) to 97.88% (95% CI: 96.78-98.98) (10 years). The prosthodontic survival rates for 1-piece IFCDPs ranged from 98.61% (95% CI: 97.80-99.43) (5 years) to 97.25% (95% CI: 95.66-98.86) (10 years). Conclusion: Treatment with mandibular IFCDPs yields high implant and prosthodontic survival rates (more than 96% after 10 years). Rough surface implants exhibited cumulative survival rates similar to the smooth surface ones (p > .05) in the edentulous mandible. The number of supporting implants and the antero-posterior implant distribution had no influence (p > .05) on the implant survival rate. The prosthetic design and veneering material, the retention type, and the loading protocol (delayed, early, and immediate) had no influence (p > .05) on the prosthodontic survival rates.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom705en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto717en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume16en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchDentistry not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110599en_US
dc.subject.keywordsDental implantsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEdentulous mandibleen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEvidence‐based dentistryen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFull archen_US
dc.subject.keywordsImplant survival ratesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFixed complete prosthesisen_US
dc.titleImplant and Prosthodontic Survival Rates with Implant Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible after at Least 5 Years: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorChronopoulos, Vasileios


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record