Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Ianen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmmison, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.editorKees Van Reesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:42:15Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:42:15Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.modified2008-02-14T08:10:22Z
dc.identifier.issn0304422Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/16678
dc.description.abstractContemporary research into the sociology of taste has, following Bourdieu (1984), primarily emphasised the role of taste judgements as mechanisms of social and cultural power, as distinctive markers of social position, or more broadly as implicated in the reproduction of social inequality. We argue that although important, such a preoccupation with the social distribution of objectified tastes-for example in music, literature, and art-has been at the expense of investigating the everyday perceptual schemes and resources used by actors to accomplish a judgement of taste. Our argument is traced using a range of classical and contemporary literature which deals with the personal/collective tension in taste, aesthetics and fashion. We use data from a recent national survey to investigate how a sample of ordinary actors understand the categories of 'good' and 'bad' taste. The analysis shows a strong collective strand in everyday definitions of taste, often linked to moral codes of interpersonal conduct. Also, taste is largely defined by people as a strategy for managing relations with others, and as a mode of self-discipline which relies on the mastery of a number of general principles that are resources for people to position their own tastes within an imagined social sphere. The paper proposes a schematic model which accounts for the range of discriminatory resources used to make judgements of taste.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.publisher.placeNorth Hollanden_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom295en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto316en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue6en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPoeticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume29en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode370199en_US
dc.titleFrom aesthetic principles to collective sentiments: The logics of everyday judgements of tasteen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2001
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record