Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorR. Kebbell, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorHatton, Christopheren_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Johnson, Shaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T11:45:40Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T11:45:40Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.modified2011-04-28T07:07:34Z
dc.identifier.issn13553259en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1348/135532504322776834en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/16902
dc.description.abstractPurpose. To identify the ways in which witnesses with and without intellectual disabilities are examined in court. Specifically to identify what questions are asked and what influence they have. Methods. Court transcripts were obtained for 16 rape, sexual assault or assault trials involving witnesses with intellectual disabilities and 16 matched cases involving witnesses from the general population. The cases were assessed systematically concerning the questioning strategies of lawyers and the influence of those strategies on witness responses. Results. Questioning of witnesses with intellectual disabilities was almost identical to that of witnesses from the general population indicating that lawyers are not altering their questioning behaviour for witnesses with intellectual disabilities, either positively or negatively. Cross-examination is particularly poor for eliciting accurate memory reports, especially for witnesses with intellectual disabilities. The accounts of witnesses with intellectual disabilities are shorter and more likely to agree with a leading question than are accounts from the general population. Conclusion. The way in which witnesses are examined does little to ensure that their memories are as accurate as possible. People with intellectual disabilities should be questioned in such a way that their ability to give accurate evidence in court is maximized.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Societyen_US
dc.publisher.placeLeicester, Englanden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.bps.org.uk/publications/journals/journaltitles/lcp.cfmen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom23en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto35en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLegal and Criminological Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume9en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode380199en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode390302en_US
dc.titleWitnesses with intellectual disabilities in court: What questions are asked and what influence do they have?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2004
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record