Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHodge, Steven
dc.contributor.editorNone named
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-28T12:01:33Z
dc.date.available2017-11-28T12:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/170026
dc.description.abstractAn assumption of Australia's competency-based vocational education and training (VET) system is that experienced practitioners from industry will, by virtue of their expertise, be well-placed to read, analyse and interpret units of competency that relate to their industry. This paper draws on research that challenges this assumption. Interviews with 30 VET practitioners about how they interpret units of competency revealed that those with extensive industry experience did not always recognise their industry in the texts. Theories of expertise and workplace knowledge offer one way to account for these counter-intuitive findings. According to these theories, higher levels of expertise are characterised by reliance on tacit knowledge and an intuitive grasp of workplace situations and challenges and little reliance on explicit, formal work-related rules and procedures. It will be argued that the explicit, formal approach to representing occupational knowledge found in units of competency does not necessarily serve to represent competent practice in the eyes of industry experts.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherNo data provided
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.avetra.org.au/pages/conference-archives-2014.html
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAVETRA 2014
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleInforming Changes in VET Policy and Practice: The Central Role of Research
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2014-04-22
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2014-04-24
dc.relation.ispartoflocationOutrigger Hotel Surfers Paradise, Qld
dc.subject.fieldofresearchTechnical, Further and Workplace Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode130108
dc.titleExpertise and the representation of knowledge in training packages
dc.typeConference output
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conferences
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publications
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Education and Professional Studies
gro.rights.copyright© 2014 AVETRA. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Use hypertext link for access to the publisher's website.
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorHodge, Steven M.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record