Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Brendanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCoiacetto, Eddoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:26:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2009-12-08T07:53:37Z
dc.identifier.issn08111146en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08111140701225545en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/17067
dc.description.abstractThe role of public land agencies in Australia has ebbed and flowed of the past few decades broadly reflecting political cycles. Initially, in the early 18970s, the Land Commission Program (LCP) was established under the Whitlam government on a rationale with two broad bases: to create more efficient and fairer land markets; and to produce higher quality design outcomes. At the end of the Whitlam era- partly resulting form objections from the private sector, government-sponsored critiques of the land program and the ideologies of conservative governments - the influence of government in land development was substantially reduced. Today, although the variety of activities of public land developers is substantially wider, there remains significant scope for increased government involvement in land development, based on the emergence of new imperatives arising from complex shifts in social conditions, community preferences and scientific knowledge. Furthermore, the imperatives that led to the establishment of the LCP in 1972 are still relevant today.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713449094en_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto19en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalUrban Policy and Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume25en_US
dc.rights.retentionNen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode319999en_US
dc.titlePositive planning in Australia: A review of historical and emergent rationalesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record