Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Geoff M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJull, Gwendolenen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Ashleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Carolynen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaris, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorCook, Chaden_US
dc.contributor.authorFrizzell, Bevanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalo, Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T01:31:00Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T01:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn00039993en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.026en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/171736
dc.description.abstractObjective To derive a clinical decision guide (CDG) to identify patients best suited for cervical diagnostic facet joint blocks. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Pain management center. Participants Consecutive patients with neck pain (N=125) referred to an interventional pain management center were approached to participate. Interventions Subjects underwent a standardized testing protocol, performed by a physiotherapist, prior to receiving diagnostic facet joint blocks. All subjects received the reference standard diagnostic facet joint block protocol, namely controlled medial branch blocks (MBBs). The physicians performing the MBBs were blinded to the local anesthetic used and findings of the clinical tests. Main Outcome Measures Multivariate regression analyses were performed in the derivation of the CDGs. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the index tests and CDGs. Results A CDG involving the findings of the manual spinal examination (MSE), palpation for segmental tenderness (PST), and extension-rotation (ER) test demonstrated a specificity of 84% (95% CI, 77-90) and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.94 (95% CI, 2.8-8.2). Sensitivity of the PST and MSE were 94% (95% CI, 90-98) and 92% (95% CI, 88-97), respectively. Negative findings on the PST were associated with a negative likelihood ratio of .08 (95% CI, .03-.24). Conclusions MSE, PST, and ER may be useful tests in identifying patients suitable for diagnostic facet joint blocks. Further research is needed to validate the CDGs prior to their routine use in clinical practice.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherW.B. Saundersen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1695en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1701en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue9en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume95en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110317en_US
dc.titleDerivation of a Clinical Decision Guide in the Diagnosis of Cervical Facet Joint Painen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record