Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, GM
dc.contributor.authorJull, G
dc.contributor.authorThomas, K
dc.contributor.authorSmith, A
dc.contributor.authorEmery, C
dc.contributor.authorFaris, P
dc.contributor.authorCook, C
dc.contributor.authorFrizzell, B
dc.contributor.authorSalo, P
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T01:31:00Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T01:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0003-9993
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/171736
dc.description.abstractObjective To derive a clinical decision guide (CDG) to identify patients best suited for cervical diagnostic facet joint blocks. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Pain management center. Participants Consecutive patients with neck pain (N=125) referred to an interventional pain management center were approached to participate. Interventions Subjects underwent a standardized testing protocol, performed by a physiotherapist, prior to receiving diagnostic facet joint blocks. All subjects received the reference standard diagnostic facet joint block protocol, namely controlled medial branch blocks (MBBs). The physicians performing the MBBs were blinded to the local anesthetic used and findings of the clinical tests. Main Outcome Measures Multivariate regression analyses were performed in the derivation of the CDGs. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the index tests and CDGs. Results A CDG involving the findings of the manual spinal examination (MSE), palpation for segmental tenderness (PST), and extension-rotation (ER) test demonstrated a specificity of 84% (95% CI, 77-90) and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.94 (95% CI, 2.8-8.2). Sensitivity of the PST and MSE were 94% (95% CI, 90-98) and 92% (95% CI, 88-97), respectively. Negative findings on the PST were associated with a negative likelihood ratio of .08 (95% CI, .03-.24). Conclusions MSE, PST, and ER may be useful tests in identifying patients suitable for diagnostic facet joint blocks. Further research is needed to validate the CDGs prior to their routine use in clinical practice.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom1695
dc.relation.ispartofpageto1701
dc.relation.ispartofissue9
dc.relation.ispartofjournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.ispartofvolume95
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPhysiotherapy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchHuman Movement and Sports Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Health and Health Services
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110317
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1103
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1106
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1117
dc.titleDerivation of a Clinical Decision Guide in the Diagnosis of Cervical Facet Joint Pain
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorSmith, Ashley D.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record