dc.contributor.author | Brown, Nadia J | |
dc.contributor.author | Kimble, Roy M | |
dc.contributor.author | Rodger, Sylvia | |
dc.contributor.author | Ware, Robert S | |
dc.contributor.author | Cuttle, Leila | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-24T23:29:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-24T23:29:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-4179 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.burns.2013.11.024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10072/172307 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The relationships between pain, stress and anxiety, and their effect on burn wound re-epithelialization have not been well explored to-date. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the Ditto™ (a hand-held electronic medical device providing procedural preparation and distraction) intervention on re-epithelialization rates in acute pediatric burns.
Methods/Design: From August 2011 to August 2012, children (4–12 years) with an acute burn presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia fulfilled the study requirements and were randomized to [1] Ditto™ intervention or [2] standard practice. Burn re-epithelialization, pain intensity, anxiety and stress measures were obtained at every dressing change until complete wound re-epithelialization.
Results: One hundred and seventeen children were randomized and 75 children were analyzed (n = 40 standard group; n = 35 Ditto™ group). Inability to predict wound management resulted in 42 participants no longer meeting the eligibility criteria. Wounds in the Ditto™ intervention group re-epithelialized faster than the standard practice group (−2.14 days (CI: −4.38 to 0.10), p-value = 0.061), and significantly faster when analyses were adjusted for mean burn depth (−2.26 days (CI: −4.48 to −0.04), p-value = 0.046). Following procedural preparation at the first change of dressing, the Ditto™ group reported lower pain intensity scores (−0.64 (CI: −1.28, 0.01) p = 0.052) and lower anxiety ratings (−1.79 (CI: −3.59, 0.01) p = 0.051). At the second and third dressing removals average pain (FPS-R and FLACC) and anxiety scores (VAS-A) were at least one point lower when Ditto™ intervention was received.
Conclusions: The Ditto™ procedural preparation and distraction device is a useful tool alongside pharmacological intervention to improve the rate of burn re-epithelialization and manage pain and anxiety during burn wound care procedures. | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Yes | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom | 204 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpageto | 213 | |
dc.relation.ispartofissue | 2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Burns | |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 40 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Clinical sciences | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearch | Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 3202 | |
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode | 320299 | |
dc.title | Play and heal: Randomized controlled trial of Ditto™ intervention efficacy on improving re-epithelialization in pediatric burns | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type.description | C1 - Articles | |
dc.type.code | C - Journal Articles | |
gro.hasfulltext | No Full Text | |
gro.griffith.author | Ware, Robert | |