Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavid, Michael C
dc.contributor.authorWare, Robert S
dc.contributor.authorAlati, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorDower, Jo
dc.contributor.authorDonald, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-16T05:41:30Z
dc.date.available2017-11-16T05:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/172327
dc.description.abstractObjective: Strategies such as reminders are frequently used to maximize baseline recruitment and for this reason are collectively termed “usual practice.” The objective of this study was to investigate substitution sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy. Study Design and Settings: Data are from the Living with Diabetes Study, which is a prospective cohort study providing a comprehensive examination of health care utilization. Baseline information was collected for 3,197 of 11,470 eligible individuals between November 2008 and October 2009. Follow-up occurred 12 months after recruitment, with outcome of interest being emergency department attendance. Biases resulting from the two recruitment programs were investigated through the comparison of adjusted logistic regression coefficients and absolute relative biases (ARBs). Results: Corresponding estimates resulting from both programs were similar except for age (75+ years). This effect was significant (β: −0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.04, −0.13) under substitution sampling, but not under “usual practice” (β: −0.36; 95% CI: −0.78, 0.07). Analysis using the ARB metric reinforced similarity, with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test failing to detect significant difference between programs (median difference: −1.01; 95% CI: −5.88, 2.02). Conclusion: Substitution sampling deserves consideration as a recruitment option alongside “usual practice,” as concerns about additional bias may be unwarranted.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom715
dc.relation.ispartofpageto721
dc.relation.ispartofissue6
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume67
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMathematical Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMedical and Health Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110399
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode01
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode11
dc.titleAssessing bias in a prospective study of diabetes that implemented substitution sampling as a recruitment strategy
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorWare, Robert
gro.griffith.authorDavid, Michael


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record