Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction

View/ Open
Author(s)
Karanjai, Angela
Cavalcanti, Eric G
Bartlett, Stephen D
Rudolph, Terry
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong
measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value: a complex number for which the
interpretation has long been debated.Weanalyse the procedure of weak measurement and
postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics
supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory
of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase
space displacements in the postselected expectation values of ...
View more >Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value: a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated.Weanalyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement deviceʼs position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts.Wefind that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
View less >
View more >Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value: a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated.Weanalyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement deviceʼs position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts.Wefind that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
View less >
Journal Title
New Journal of Physics
Volume
17
Copyright Statement
©2015 IOP Publishing Ltd and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Subject
Quantum Physics not elsewhere classified
Physical Sciences