Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ted
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brett
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorPalermo, Claire
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Liz
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T01:53:56Z
dc.date.available2018-01-05T01:53:56Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0283-9318
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01048.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/172734
dc.description.abstractBackground:  It is important for educators to consider the communication skills of students enrolled in health science programmes. To date, research into this area is limited, and having measures that are valid and reliable would assist educators and researchers to complete high-quality investigations. Purpose:  The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure of Communicator Styles Measure. Method:  Data from the Communicator Styles Measure completed by 860 undergraduate health science students enrolled in eight different courses at an Australian university (response rate of 59%) were analysed using principal component analysis with varimax rotation and a cluster analysis using elementary linkage analysis. The Communicator Styles Measure is a self-report scale consisting of 40 items designed to assess ten communication styles and one’s perception of his/her ability to communicate. Results:  Communicator Styles Measure items loaded onto five new viable factors labelled personable, energetic, confident, open and confronting. Six items of the original 40 from the Communicator Styles Measure did not load onto any factor and were therefore considered redundant. Conclusion:  The original factor structure proposed by the Communicator Styles Measure’s author was not supported, which calls into question its construct validity. However, the five new factors identified in this study may be useful for researchers and educators when assessing the communication skills of students and practitioners. Further investigation into the construct validity and reliability of the five new Communicator Styles Measure factors is recommended.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom363
dc.relation.ispartofpageto372
dc.relation.ispartofissue2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofvolume27
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchNursing
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode111099
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1110
dc.titleFactor structure of the Communicator Styles Measure (CSM) when used with undergraduate health science students
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBoyle, Malcolm


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record