Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaw, J.
dc.contributor.authorReilly, Sheena
dc.contributor.authorSnow, Pamela
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-27T00:36:10Z
dc.date.available2018-04-27T00:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1368-2822en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1460-6984.12027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/173304
dc.description.abstractBackground: Historically speech and language therapy services for children have been framed within a rehabilitative framework with explicit assumptions made about providing therapy to individuals. While this is clearly important in many cases, we argue that this model needs revisiting for a number of reasons. First, our understanding of the nature of disability, and therefore communication disabilities, has changed over the past century. Second, there is an increasing understanding of the impact that the social gradient has on early communication difficulties. Finally, understanding how these factors interact with one other and have an impact across the life course remains poorly understood. Aims: To describe the public health paradigm and explore its implications for speech and language therapy with children. Methods & Procedures: We test the application of public health methodologies to speech and language therapy services by looking at four dimensions of service delivery: (1) the uptake of services and whether those children who need services receive them; (2) the development of universal prevention services in relation to social disadvantage; (3) the risk of over-interpreting co-morbidity from clinical samples; and (4) the overlap between communicative competence and mental health. Outcomes & Conclusions: It is concluded that there is a strong case for speech and language therapy services to be reconceptualized to respond to the needs of the whole population and according to socially determined needs, focusing on primary prevention. This is not to disregard individual need, but to highlight the needs of the population as a whole. Although the socio-political context is different between countries, we maintain that this is relevant wherever speech and language therapists have a responsibility for covering whole populations. Finally, we recommend that speech and language therapy services be conceptualized within the framework laid down in The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom486en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto496en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disordersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume48en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchClinical Sciences not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110399en_US
dc.titleChild speech, language and communication need re-examined in a public health context: A new direction for the speech and language therapy professionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record