Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Christopher J
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Megan I
dc.contributor.authorPossingham, Hugh P
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Anthony J
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T04:24:41Z
dc.date.available2018-01-05T04:24:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.12159
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/173592
dc.description.abstractAim Cumulative impact maps are used to identify the spatial distribution of multiple human impacts to species and ecosystems. Impacts can be caused by local stressors which can be managed, such as eutrophication, and by global stressors that cannot be managed, such as climate change. Cumulative impact maps typically assume that there are no interactive effects between stressors on biodiversity. However, the benefits of managing the ecosystem are affected by interactions between stressors. Our aim was to determine whether the assumption of no interactions in impact maps leads to incorrect identification of sites for management. Location General, Australasia. Methods We used the additive effects model to incorporate the effects of interactions into an interactive impact map. Seagrass meadows in Australasia threatened by a local stressor, nutrient inputs, and a global stressor, warming, were used as a case study. The reduction in the impact index was quantified for reductions in the nutrient stressor. We examined the outcomes for three scenarios: no interactions, antagonistic interactions or synergistic interactions. Results Cumulative impact maps imply that reducing a local stressor will give equivalent reductions in the impact index everywhere, regardless of spatial variability in a global stressor. We show that reductions in the impact index were greatest in refuges from warming if there was an antagonistic interaction between stressors, and greatest in areas of high warming stress if there was a synergistic interaction. Reducing the nutrient stressor in refuges from warming always reduced the impact index, regardless of the interaction. Main conclusions Interactions between local and global stressors should be considered when using cumulative impact maps to identify sites where management of a local stressor will provide the greatest impact reduction. If the interaction type is unknown, impact maps can be used to identify refuges from global stressors, as sites for management.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom538
dc.relation.ispartofpageto546
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDiversity and Distributions
dc.relation.ispartofvolume20
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEcological Applications not elsewhere classified
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBiological Sciences
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode050199
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode05
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode06
dc.titleInteractions between global and local stressors determine management effectiveness in cumulative impact mapping
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorBrown, Chris J.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record