Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenman, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Micheleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T12:32:01Z
dc.date.available2018-11-19T12:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn0157-6321en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00348.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/173636
dc.description.abstractIn many developed countries, the provision of disability services has undergone significant transformations, from institutional to community based care, and from oganisational to personalised funding. Yet delivering disability support remains an ongoing challenge for governments. Specifically, the relative success of different types of disability support governance is convoluted and problematic given the diversity and complexity of disability support systems and the people they serve. To enhance the systematic analysis and evaluation of disability support governance, this paper conceptually advances four distinct models based on the locus of control and coordination of such support: uncoordinated; casework governance; dwelling‐based governance; and user‐coordinated. Using illustrations from case studies of individuals receiving care, the identification of these ideal types enables their relative strengths, weaknesses, and the occasions of governance failure to be articulated. No one model is universally applicable to people, nor immune to failure. Furthermore, the paper presents a novel approach to visualising actual disability support arrangements as social networks. The utility of such visualisations for analysing individual and system‐ wide arrangements is outlined. In the context of Australia's developing National Disability Insurance Scheme, these conceptual and analytical developments are argued to be important tools for policy and service analysis and reform.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom233en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto252en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue3en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAustralian Journal of Social Issuesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume50en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCriminology not elsewhere classifieden_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160299en_US
dc.titleModels of disability support governance: a framework for assessing and reforming social policyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorFoster, Michele M.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record