Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Groves, Michele
Gordon, Jill
Ryan, Greg
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2007
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Whatever the method used to select medical students (whether academic, psychometric, or interview), the basic problem in assessing the method’s predictive capability is that only candidates who perform at the higher levels in the assessment will be admitted. The only way to test the predictive validity of an assessment is to admit candidates from a much wider band of performance, creating a much less compressed score range for comparison. By definition, candidates with lower scores are excluded, thus making this analysis impossible.Whatever the method used to select medical students (whether academic, psychometric, or interview), the basic problem in assessing the method’s predictive capability is that only candidates who perform at the higher levels in the assessment will be admitted. The only way to test the predictive validity of an assessment is to admit candidates from a much wider band of performance, creating a much less compressed score range for comparison. By definition, candidates with lower scores are excluded, thus making this analysis impossible.
View less >
View less >
Journal Title
Medical Journal of Australia
Volume
186
Issue
3
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
Groves MA, Gordon J and Ryan G. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think? Med J Aust 2007; 186 (3): 120-123. © Copyright 2007. The Medical Journal of Australia - reproduced with permission.
Subject
Medical and Health Sciences
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences