Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, Benjaminen_US
dc.contributor.authorHawker, Darrylen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Muller, Jochenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeusch, Fredericen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Tremblay, Louisen_US
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Heatheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:18:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:18:03Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.issn01604120en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2007.01.008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/17688
dc.description.abstractChemical (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, GC-MS) and biological (E-Screen assay) analyses were used to determine the concentrations of 15 endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and estrogen equivalent (EEq) in grab and passive samples from five municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in South East Queensland, Australia. EEq concentrations derived by E-Screen assays for the grab samples were between 108-356 ng/L for the influents and < 1-14.8 ng/L for the effluents with the exception of one effluent sample which was at 67.8 ng/L EEq. The EDC concentrations and EEq values for the passive samples were several times lower than those of the grab samples: a decrease probably caused by, but not limited to biofouling, low flow rate, biodegradation and temperature which can progressively reduce the uptake of compounds into the sampler. At this stage, grab sampling is the most reliable method for field monitoring; nevertheless, passive sampler is a useful sampling tool but the method requires more research to ensure that the information obtained can be interpreted appropriately. Although alkylphenols and phthalates were detected at higher concentrations in the wastewater samples as compared to natural hormones, the environmental risk may be negligible as their estrogenic potencies are several orders of magnitude lower than that of the natural estrogens. In most wastewater samples, the natural estrogens contributed to 60% or more of the EEq value. Removal efficacy of most estrogenic and xenoestrogenic compounds from the conventional activated sludge or biological nutrient removal (BNR) WWTPs monitored in this study was in the range of 80-> 99%. The efficiency of the WWTPs in removing estrogenic activity was > 95%. The EEqs of the E-Screen and those calculated from the results of extensive chemical analyses using the estradiol equivalency factors were comparable for most of the WWTPs samples.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.publisher.placeOxford, United Kingdomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom654en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto669en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue5en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEnvironment Internationalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume33en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode259902en_US
dc.titleComprehensive Study of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds Using Grab and Passive Sampling at Selected Wastewater Treatment Plants in South East Queensland, Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.date.issued2015-05-12T05:11:45Z
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record