• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Regulating genetically modified organisms: A case study assessing regulatory quality and performance

    Author(s)
    Lawson, Charles
    Hindmarsh, Richard
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Hindmarsh, Richard A.
    Lawson, Charles
    Year published
    2007
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This article examines the recent statutory review of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth) (GT Act) and the Gene Technology Agreement as a case study of the analytical approach that might be applied to assessing the quality and performance of regulation. The conclusion is that by failing to apply an analytical approach according to the Australian Government's commitment to the Competition Principles Agreement, or take into account the results of applying that approach in developing and implementing the GT Act, there has been a failure to adequately address both the operation of the GT Act and its ongoing justification as a means ...
    View more >
    This article examines the recent statutory review of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth) (GT Act) and the Gene Technology Agreement as a case study of the analytical approach that might be applied to assessing the quality and performance of regulation. The conclusion is that by failing to apply an analytical approach according to the Australian Government's commitment to the Competition Principles Agreement, or take into account the results of applying that approach in developing and implementing the GT Act, there has been a failure to adequately address both the operation of the GT Act and its ongoing justification as a means of efficiently and effectively regulating genetically modified organisms.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Australian Business Law Review
    Volume
    35
    Issue
    3
    Publisher URI
    http://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/catalogue/productdetails.asp?id=656
    Subject
    Accounting, Auditing and Accountability
    Law
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/17807
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander