Revisiting Merits Review of Patent Application, Grant and Validity Decisions under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)
Author(s)
Lawson, Charles
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2007
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article reviews the reports from 1935 to the present addressing administrative and judicial decision making about Patents Act 1990 (Cth) patents. In particular the article addresses the review of examination (and modified examination), opposition, re-examination and revocation (including as a cross-claim to infringement) decisions under the Act and whether the Commissioner of Patents' decisions should be subject to "merits review" by a generalist administrative tribunal. The article concludes that the role of the Federal Court in dealing with revocation as a cross-claim to infringement proceedings (exercising judicial ...
View more >This article reviews the reports from 1935 to the present addressing administrative and judicial decision making about Patents Act 1990 (Cth) patents. In particular the article addresses the review of examination (and modified examination), opposition, re-examination and revocation (including as a cross-claim to infringement) decisions under the Act and whether the Commissioner of Patents' decisions should be subject to "merits review" by a generalist administrative tribunal. The article concludes that the role of the Federal Court in dealing with revocation as a cross-claim to infringement proceedings (exercising judicial powers) needs to be resolved. However, considerable potential to minimise the cost, complexity, timeliness, and uncertainty of outcomes of patent decisions exists in changes to the Commissioner's practices in examining patent applications and the statutory framework for reconsidering the Commissioner's decisions.
View less >
View more >This article reviews the reports from 1935 to the present addressing administrative and judicial decision making about Patents Act 1990 (Cth) patents. In particular the article addresses the review of examination (and modified examination), opposition, re-examination and revocation (including as a cross-claim to infringement) decisions under the Act and whether the Commissioner of Patents' decisions should be subject to "merits review" by a generalist administrative tribunal. The article concludes that the role of the Federal Court in dealing with revocation as a cross-claim to infringement proceedings (exercising judicial powers) needs to be resolved. However, considerable potential to minimise the cost, complexity, timeliness, and uncertainty of outcomes of patent decisions exists in changes to the Commissioner's practices in examining patent applications and the statutory framework for reconsidering the Commissioner's decisions.
View less >
Journal Title
Australian Journal of Administrative Law
Volume
14
Issue
4
Publisher URI
Subject
Law