Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMees, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDodson, Jagoen_US
dc.contributor.editorJohn Loveringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T14:33:58Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T14:33:58Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2009-08-25T07:43:15Z
dc.identifier.issn13563475en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13563470701346568en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/18502
dc.description.abstractCommunicative planning has helped to illuminate the role of technical reason in planning processes. Transport planning has had little exposure to the communicative perspective. This paper examines transport planning in Auckland, New Zealand, from a communicative planning perspective. The paper argues that the historical dominance of technical reason has biased strategic transport policy towards supporting automobiles over more sustainable modes. The paper demonstrates the dominance of technical rationality in transport strategy-making processes and institutions in contrast to expressed public preferences. The paper concludes by arguing that the achievement of greater sustainability in Auckland's transport, and elsewhere, depends on a greater communicative emphasis in regional planning and transport strategy making.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent177009 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUKen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13563475.aspen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom35en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto53en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Planning Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume12en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode310103en_US
dc.titleBacktracking Auckland?: Technical and Communicative Reason in Metropolitan Transport Planningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2007 Taylor & Francis. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.en_AU
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record