Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Darrellen_US
dc.contributor.authorMirfenderesk, Hamiden_US
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, Rodgeren_US
dc.contributor.editorC.J. Lemckerten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T12:10:43Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T12:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.modified2009-09-07T23:30:10Z
dc.identifier.issn07490208en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/18958
dc.description.abstractManaging hazards associated with shoreline responses to extreme events and the provision of safe boating access is an ongoing concern for coastal authorities. The open sandy coastline of Gold Coast city is a wave dominated coast with a highly variable wave climate and a narrow continental shelf thus experiencing substantial variations in long-shore transport rates. Detailed wave transformation information is central to further investigations of sediment transport processes as complex bathymetry associated with trained river entrances and rocky headlands causes localised interruptions to the overall northward littoral drift. Temporal variations in wave energy are driven by a wide range of swell direction and size while spatial variations occur as a result of the strong refraction during particular swell events. This paper presents a comparison of two near shore wave models of the region using MIKE 21 and SWAN. The transformation of waves arriving from offshore is simulated using the models for selected time series of wave parameters. The parameterized boundary conditions are derived from NOAA Wave Watch III global wave model data. Model output is compared with observed data from existing wave recording buoys at Gold Coast Seaway and Point Lookout. The inclusion of wind in the modelling undertaken did not improve the models' accuracy and winds in excess of 10 ms-1 led to an over-estimation of significant wave height while increasing the processing time. Sheltering of the near-shore site during southerly swell conditions was well-represented by the modelling.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent437059 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherCoastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.cerf-jcr.org/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom312en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto316en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue50en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Coastal Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolumeSIen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode291101en_US
dc.titleComparison of two wave models for Gold Coast, Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environmenten_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2007 Coastal Education and Research Foundation Inc (CERF). Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.en_AU
gro.date.issued2007
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record