Show simple item record

dc.contributor.convenorJonathon Louth (Administrator)en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, A Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorUhr, Dr Johnen_US
dc.contributor.editorChristine Beasley, Lisa Hill, Carol Johnson, Greg McCarthy, Clem Macintyreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T08:59:54Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T08:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.refuriwww.adelaide.edu.au/apsa/papers/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/1971
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the philosophy and policy context of integrity system assessment activities (including the international context for such assessments), reviews the outcome of the Queensland public sector pilot study, and presents a framework methodology for the present and future integrity system assessment. It also previews key challenges and conclusions of the assessment, and analyses critical issues about the political legitimacy of integrity concepts, including the fundamental question: who defines integrity and why should they be listened to?en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_US
dc.format.extent83348 bytes
dc.format.extent1007736 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Adelaideen_US
dc.publisher.placeAdelaideen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.adelaide.edu.au/apsa/papers/en_US
dc.relation.ispartof0en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameAustralasian Political Studies Association Conference 2004en_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleAPSA Conference Proceedings - Refereed Papersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2004-09-29en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2004-10-01en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationAdelaideen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode360201en_US
dc.titleIntegrity Systems: Conceiving, Describing, Assessingen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright remains with the author[s] 2004. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the conference's website for access to the definitive, published version.en_US
gro.date.issued2015-06-04T03:40:49Z
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record