Mapping a field of suppression surrounding visual stimuli
Author(s)
Chappell, Mark
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2007
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The brightness of a small incremental flash was found to be considerably suppressed in the vicinity of a moving visual stimulus (effect size, d, up to 6), and less so around a stationary stimulus. The pattern of suppression was mapped and extended 3.5ꠡway from a stationary stimulus, and 10.5ꠢehind, and ahead of, a moving stimulus. A second experiment found that dark flashes appeared less dark in the presence of an inducing stimulus of either polarity. Combined results suggest that perceived contrast was being suppressed, in all cases by an inducing stimulus of lesser contrast, and in most cases of lesser luminance. These ...
View more >The brightness of a small incremental flash was found to be considerably suppressed in the vicinity of a moving visual stimulus (effect size, d, up to 6), and less so around a stationary stimulus. The pattern of suppression was mapped and extended 3.5ꠡway from a stationary stimulus, and 10.5ꠢehind, and ahead of, a moving stimulus. A second experiment found that dark flashes appeared less dark in the presence of an inducing stimulus of either polarity. Combined results suggest that perceived contrast was being suppressed, in all cases by an inducing stimulus of lesser contrast, and in most cases of lesser luminance. These findings were compared with a number of recent models of the perception of the position of moving visual stimuli. These assume that in the wake of such a stimulus, at certain retinal or cortical areas, there is a region of neural inhibition, and that preceding them there is a (bow-wave-like) region of neural excitation. The current findings confirm the inhibitory, but not the excitatory, assumptions in these theories.
View less >
View more >The brightness of a small incremental flash was found to be considerably suppressed in the vicinity of a moving visual stimulus (effect size, d, up to 6), and less so around a stationary stimulus. The pattern of suppression was mapped and extended 3.5ꠡway from a stationary stimulus, and 10.5ꠢehind, and ahead of, a moving stimulus. A second experiment found that dark flashes appeared less dark in the presence of an inducing stimulus of either polarity. Combined results suggest that perceived contrast was being suppressed, in all cases by an inducing stimulus of lesser contrast, and in most cases of lesser luminance. These findings were compared with a number of recent models of the perception of the position of moving visual stimuli. These assume that in the wake of such a stimulus, at certain retinal or cortical areas, there is a region of neural inhibition, and that preceding them there is a (bow-wave-like) region of neural excitation. The current findings confirm the inhibitory, but not the excitatory, assumptions in these theories.
View less >
Journal Title
Journal of Vision
Volume
7
Issue
10
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© 2007 Association for Research in Vision and Opthalmology (ARVO)Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author for more information.
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology