Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorE. Gibbs, Marieen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Crowe, Simonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Amyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMileusnic, Radmilaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T19:41:16Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T19:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2008-11-03
dc.identifier.issn03619230en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.032en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/20268
dc.description.abstractA one-trial learning task, where chicks learn that a bead of a particular shape and/or colour has a bitter taste (because it has been coated in 100% methyl anthranilate, MeA) and subsequently avoids it on test, has been widely used by research groups across the world. However, there are some differences in the results reported by different research laboratories. One important difference is found when chicks are trained with a diluted bitter taste on the bead (10 or 20% MeA); memory is not consolidated and fades, lasting for different times. At Monash and La Trobe Universities, memory lasts for 30 min but at the Open University (OU), memory lasts for 4-6 h before fading. Differences in protocol that may explain this apparent discrepancy are whether the chicks have seen the bead before (novelty) and whether the colour or the shape of the bead is an important feature. In this review,we discuss these and other factors that may contribute to the differences in the characteristics of memory processing at Monash and at the OU, such as chick strain, hatchery or laboratory incubated chicks, age at training. It is clear that there is a difference between passive avoidance and discriminative avoidance protocols and this may explain the differences in duration of the memory with weakly reinforced learning. Is the OU task a more salient experience because of the novelty of the bead and therefore a 'stronger' learning experience? The different protocols may allow different questions to be addressed.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Incen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/525456/description#descriptionen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom198en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto207en_US
dc.relation.ispartofedition2008en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBrain Research Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume76en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode270502en_US
dc.titleA comparison of protocols for passive and discriminative avoidance learning tasks in the domestic chicken_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record