Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, Donnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChenoweth, Lesleyen_US
dc.contributor.editorBanks, S., Clifford, D., Preston-Shoot, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:17:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:17:17Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2008-12-11T01:37:49Z
dc.identifier.issn1749-6535en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17496530801948739en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/20821
dc.description.abstractEthical decision-making is a core part of the work of social work and human service practitioners, who confront with regularity dilemmas of duty of care; confidentiality, privacy and disclosure; choice and autonomy; and distribution of increasingly scarce resources. This article details the development and application of the Inclusive Model of Ethical Decision making, created in response to growing awareness of the complexities of work in both public and private sectors. The model rests of four key platforms that are constructed from important foundational values and principles. These platforms are: Accountability, Consultation, Cultural Sensitivity and Critical Reflection, and underlie the dynamic five-step process that uses a reflective yet pragmatic approach to identify and analyse all relevant aspects of an ethical dilemma. The article begins by exploring the anatomy of an ethical dilemma, including the identification of competing ethical principles. It then moves on to highlight the different points in a decision-making process where difficulties typically arise for practitioners who may confront problems with interpretation of ethical codes, lack of access to needed resources and supports, or who may find themselves bound by legal or organisational restrictions. It is argued that this model has useful application for both social work education and practice.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/17496535.aspen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom38en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto49en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEthics and Social Welfareen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume2en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode370299en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode370204en_US
dc.titleLeave No Stone Unturned: The Inclusive Model of Ethical Decision-Makingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Health, School of Human Services and Social Worken_US
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record