Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeinemann, Meganen_US
dc.contributor.authorSellick, Kenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRickard, Claireen_US
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Pamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGrail, Matthewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:57:52Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:57:52Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2009-02-11T08:41:40Z
dc.identifier.issn13227114en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00696.xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/21262
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Dinamap 8100 automated blood pressure machine against three internationally recognized criteria. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were taken concurrently by two nurses using the automated machine and a manual sphygmomanometer. Results demonstrated agreement between automated and manual readings on one set of criteria for both systolic and diastolic pressures, and support for systolic readings only on one other criterion. Comparison of mean differences between automated and manual measures showed the automated machine consistently under-read both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The conclusion from this study was that the Dinamap 8100 machine can be used with some degree of confidence to assess systolic blood pressures in a general population of adult hospital inpatients, but with caution when taking diastolic readings.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.format.extent143253 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.publisher.placeCarlton, Vicen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118000587/homeen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom296en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto302en_US
dc.relation.ispartofissue4en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Nursing Practiceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume14en_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode321103en_US
dc.titleAutomated versus manual blood pressure measurement: A randomized crossover trialen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 2008 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The definitive version is available at www.interscience.wiley.comen_AU
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextFull Text


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record