Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGroves, Michele
dc.contributor.authorScott, Ian
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-04
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T20:35:25Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T20:35:25Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.date.modified2009-03-02T06:51:48Z
dc.identifier.issn1466-187
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/21573.1
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to develop and trial a method to monitor the evolution of clinical reasoning in a PBL curriculum that is suitable for use in a large medical school. Termed Clinical Reasoning Problems (CRPs), it is based on the notion that clinical reasoning is dependent on the identification and correct interpretation of certain critical clinical features. Each problem consists of a clinical scenario comprising presentation, history and physical examination. Based on this information, subjects are asked to nominate the two most likely diagnoses and to list the clinical features that they considered in formulating their diagnoses, indicating whether these features supported or opposed the nominated diagnoses. Students at different levels of medical training completed a set of 10 CRPs as well as the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory, a self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess reasoning style. Responses were scored against those of a reference group of general practitioners. Results indicate that the CRPs are an easily administered, reliable and valid assessment of clinical reasoning, able to successfully monitor its development throughout medical training. Consequently, they can be employed to assess clinical reasoning skill in individual students and to evaluate the success of undergraduate medical schools in providing effective tuition in clinical reasoning.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.publisher.placeLondon, UK
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom507
dc.relation.ispartofpageto515
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMedical Teacher
dc.relation.ispartofvolume24
dc.subject.fieldofresearchEducation Systems
dc.subject.fieldofresearchCurriculum and Pedagogy
dc.subject.fieldofresearchSpecialist Studies in Education
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1301
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1302
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1303
dc.titleAssessing clinical reasoning: a method to monitor its development in a PBL curriculum.
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codec1x
gro.facultyGriffith Health Faculty
gro.date.issued2002
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorGroves, Michele


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record