Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDi Piramo, Danielaen_US
dc.contributor.editorN/Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T00:17:33Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T00:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.modified2009-09-07T23:32:25Z
dc.identifier.refurihttp://www.uq.edu.au/ocis/published-proceedingsen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttp://www.polsis.uq.edu.au//OCIS/dipiramo.pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/23107
dc.description.abstractPopulist charismatic leaders have power to mobilise the people. According to Laclau (1977), the articulation of a populist discourse, where a leader will typically claim to speak on behalf of the people, can provide a valid alternative to an increasingly discordant dominant ideological discourse. Furthermore, and this is particularly true of Latin America, populist leadership has been most successful in political terrain's where first, the political culture has traditionally endorsed personalised forms of leadership and second, where political institutions have traditionally been weak. Under these circumstances, it is not surprising that the ever-present spectre of authoritarianism continues to undermine the fragile democracies of Latin America. It is also true that such forms of leadership pose serious constraints to the possibility of a shift towards more horizontal organisational forms in politics. But, as this paper argues, there are problems with the assumptions that radical democrats make, particularly in regard to representation and popular sovereignty; furthermore, the fundamental premise that 'the people' are able to organise and lead themselves seems unduly optimistic. It is concluded that leadership is essential to the political process, and in particular that populist and/or charismatic leaders are effective agents of political transformation, whilst acknowledging that they can be dangerous to egalitarian sociopolitical causes attempting to enhance the autonomy of civil societies. These dynamics are illustrated by the ambiguity inherent in the role played by Mexico's Subcomandante Marcos: whilst he deliberately avoids populist tactics that might undermine the ideals of horizontal anti-hierarchical politics, ironically it is his personal appeal that has been crucial in promoting his political message.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Queenslanden_US
dc.publisher.placeBrisbane, Queenslanden_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.uq.edu.au/ocis/about-ocisen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationNen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofconferencenameOCIS 2008: Oceanic Conference on International Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofconferencetitleOnline Proceedings: OCIS 2008en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdatefrom2008-07-02en_US
dc.relation.ispartofdateto2008-07-04en_US
dc.relation.ispartoflocationBrisbaneen_US
dc.rights.retentionYen_AU
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPublic Policyen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode160510en_US
dc.title“Speak for Me”: Populist Leadership in Latin America and the Mirage of Horizontal Politicsen_US
dc.typeConference outputen_US
dc.type.descriptionE1 - Conference Publications (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeE - Conference Publicationsen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Business School, School of Government and International Relationsen_US
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference outputs
    Contains papers delivered by Griffith authors at national and international conferences.

Show simple item record