Sovereignty: Some considerations
View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Duncanson, Ian
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2008
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to assert that sovereignty is not a useful doctrine when applied domestically in modern times in the form it often assumes, namely a locus of legal or political authority which has an existence beyond the political system governed by it and which may therefore have resort to extraordinary power in exceptional circumstances. The conviction that this must be so has gained the status of common sense in some circles: after all, must the state not have emergency powers to protect itself ? But what is ‘itself ’? — a question that arises whenever ‘state’ infrastructure is sold to largely wealthy purchasers. ...
View more >The purpose of this paper is to assert that sovereignty is not a useful doctrine when applied domestically in modern times in the form it often assumes, namely a locus of legal or political authority which has an existence beyond the political system governed by it and which may therefore have resort to extraordinary power in exceptional circumstances. The conviction that this must be so has gained the status of common sense in some circles: after all, must the state not have emergency powers to protect itself ? But what is ‘itself ’? — a question that arises whenever ‘state’ infrastructure is sold to largely wealthy purchasers. Is the state not the taxpayers’ agent? Why should they be asked to pay over again for assets they already own?
View less >
View more >The purpose of this paper is to assert that sovereignty is not a useful doctrine when applied domestically in modern times in the form it often assumes, namely a locus of legal or political authority which has an existence beyond the political system governed by it and which may therefore have resort to extraordinary power in exceptional circumstances. The conviction that this must be so has gained the status of common sense in some circles: after all, must the state not have emergency powers to protect itself ? But what is ‘itself ’? — a question that arises whenever ‘state’ infrastructure is sold to largely wealthy purchasers. Is the state not the taxpayers’ agent? Why should they be asked to pay over again for assets they already own?
View less >
Journal Title
Law Text Culture
Volume
12
Issue
1
Note
After all reasonable attempts to contact the copyright owner, this work was published in good faith in interests of the digital preservation of academic scholarship. Please contact copyright@griffith.edu.au with any questions or concerns
Subject
Law
Criminology