Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnstone, Richard
dc.contributor.editorDae Pinto
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-04T23:51:51Z
dc.date.available2019-04-04T23:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.modified2009-06-18T08:50:30Z
dc.identifier.issn18366953
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/23222
dc.description.abstractOccupational health and safety (OHS) in Australia has, to date, been regulated by one Commonwealth, six State and two Territory general OHS statutes,1 together with a number of specific statutes covering public safety and OHS in industries such as mining, the maritime industry, transport, electricity and dangerous goods.2 The Australian model of OHS regulation3 places broad general duties on a range of parties materially influencing OHS (employers, self-employed persons, persons in control of workplaces, employees, designers, manufacturers and suppliers of plant, substances and structures), supplemented by regulations and codes of practice which provide further detail and guidance. Compliance with these standards is monitored and enforced by inspectorates with broad powers of inspection and empowered to take enforcement measures ranging from informal measures (advice and persuasion), to administrative sanctions (improvement, prohibition and infringement notices), to accepting enforceable undertakings and to formal prosecution. All of the statutes now contain provisions for the election of employee health and safety representatives and committees. Health and safety representatives are given significant powers and functions including the rights to inspect the workplace, receive OHS information and to be consulted on OHS issues and, in some jurisdictions, the power to enforce via provisional improvement notices and the right to direct that dangerous work cease. While all of the OHS statutes conform to this basic model, closer scrutiny reveals sometimes quite major differences in form, detail and substantive matters between the OHS statutes and the regulations and codes of practice made under those statutes.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.format.extent1520278 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCurtin Business School
dc.publisher.placePerth
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.curtin.edu.au/
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom35
dc.relation.ispartofpageto58
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Applied Law and Policy
dc.relation.ispartofvolume1
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLabour Law
dc.subject.fieldofresearchBusiness and Management
dc.subject.fieldofresearchLaw
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode180118
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1503
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode1801
dc.title'Harmonising Occupational Health and Safety Regulation in Australia: The First Review of the National OHS Review'
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.facultyArts, Education & Law Group, School of Law
gro.rights.copyright© 2008 Journal of Applied Law and Policy. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Use hypertext link to access the publisher's website.
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextFull Text
gro.griffith.authorJohnstone, Richard


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record