• myGriffith
    • Staff portal
    • Contact Us⌄
      • Future student enquiries 1800 677 728
      • Current student enquiries 1800 154 055
      • International enquiries +61 7 3735 6425
      • General enquiries 07 3735 7111
      • Online enquiries
      • Staff phonebook
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    • Home
    • Griffith Research Online
    • Journal articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

  • All of Griffith Research Online
    • Communities & Collections
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • This Collection
    • Authors
    • By Issue Date
    • Titles
  • Statistics

  • Most Popular Items
  • Statistics by Country
  • Most Popular Authors
  • Support

  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Admin login

  • Login
  • Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects

    Author(s)
    Ong, Constantine TT
    Ivanovski, Saso
    Needleman, Ian G
    Retzepi, Maria
    Moles, David R
    Tonetti, Maurizio S
    Donos, Nikolaos
    Griffith University Author(s)
    Ivanovski, Saso
    Year published
    2008
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives: To determine implant outcomes in partially dentate patients who have been treated for periodontitis compared with periodontally healthy patients. Material and Methods: All longitudinal studies (until March 2006) of endosseous dental implants of at least 6 months of loading were searched. Studies presented with one or more of the outcome measures (implant survival, success, bone‐level change, peri‐implantitis) were included. Screening, data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: From 4448 citations, 546 full‐text papers were screened and nine studies were ...
    View more >
    Objectives: To determine implant outcomes in partially dentate patients who have been treated for periodontitis compared with periodontally healthy patients. Material and Methods: All longitudinal studies (until March 2006) of endosseous dental implants of at least 6 months of loading were searched. Studies presented with one or more of the outcome measures (implant survival, success, bone‐level change, peri‐implantitis) were included. Screening, data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: From 4448 citations, 546 full‐text papers were screened and nine studies were included. Overall, the non‐periodontitis patients demonstrated better outcomes than treated periodontitis patients. However, the strength of evidence showed that the studies included were at a medium to high risk of bias, with lack of appropriate reporting and analysis of outcomes plus lack of accounting for confounders, especially smoking. Furthermore, the studies showed variability in the definitions of treated and non‐periodontitis, outcome criteria and quality of supportive periodontal therapy. Meta‐analysis could not be performed due to heterogeneity of the chief study characteristics. Conclusions: There is some evidence that patients treated for periodontitis may experience more implant loss and complications around implants than non‐periodontitis patients. Evidence is stronger for implant survival than implant success; methodological issues limit the potential to draw robust conclusions.
    View less >
    Journal Title
    Journal of Clinical Periodontology
    Volume
    35
    Issue
    5
    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01207.x
    Subject
    Dentistry
    Periodontics
    Publication URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23311
    Collection
    • Journal articles

    Footer

    Disclaimer

    • Privacy policy
    • Copyright matters
    • CRICOS Provider - 00233E

    Tagline

    • Gold Coast
    • Logan
    • Brisbane - Queensland, Australia
    First Peoples of Australia
    • Aboriginal
    • Torres Strait Islander