Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOng, Constantine TT
dc.contributor.authorIvanovski, Saso
dc.contributor.authorNeedleman, Ian G
dc.contributor.authorRetzepi, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMoles, David R
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S
dc.contributor.authorDonos, Nikolaos
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T15:16:59Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T15:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.modified2012-05-29T22:27:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01207.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/23311
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine implant outcomes in partially dentate patients who have been treated for periodontitis compared with periodontally healthy patients. Material and Methods: All longitudinal studies (until March 2006) of endosseous dental implants of at least 6 months of loading were searched. Studies presented with one or more of the outcome measures (implant survival, success, bone‐level change, peri‐implantitis) were included. Screening, data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: From 4448 citations, 546 full‐text papers were screened and nine studies were included. Overall, the non‐periodontitis patients demonstrated better outcomes than treated periodontitis patients. However, the strength of evidence showed that the studies included were at a medium to high risk of bias, with lack of appropriate reporting and analysis of outcomes plus lack of accounting for confounders, especially smoking. Furthermore, the studies showed variability in the definitions of treated and non‐periodontitis, outcome criteria and quality of supportive periodontal therapy. Meta‐analysis could not be performed due to heterogeneity of the chief study characteristics. Conclusions: There is some evidence that patients treated for periodontitis may experience more implant loss and complications around implants than non‐periodontitis patients. Evidence is stronger for implant survival than implant success; methodological issues limit the potential to draw robust conclusions.
dc.description.peerreviewedYes
dc.description.publicationstatusYes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofstudentpublicationN
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom438
dc.relation.ispartofpageto462
dc.relation.ispartofissue5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
dc.relation.ispartofvolume35
dc.rights.retentionY
dc.subject.fieldofresearchDentistry
dc.subject.fieldofresearchPeriodontics
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode3203
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode320310
dc.titleSystematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Articles
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articles
gro.date.issued2008
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text
gro.griffith.authorIvanovski, Saso


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record