Complaining behaviour: one, two or three types?

View/ Open
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn
Griffith University Author(s)
Year published
2004
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper examines three competing views on the dimensionality of complaining behaviour.
Some researchers have measured voice complaint behaviour with one dimension while other
researchers have used between two and three dimensions when measuring voice complaint
behaviour. Using first-order CFA this paper tests and finds support for the hypothesis that there
are three voice complaint behaviours: complaints direct to seller, complaints to friends and
family and finally complaints to a third party. The results of this paper suggest that complaining
behaviour should not be measured uni dimensionally. Considering complaining ...
View more >This paper examines three competing views on the dimensionality of complaining behaviour. Some researchers have measured voice complaint behaviour with one dimension while other researchers have used between two and three dimensions when measuring voice complaint behaviour. Using first-order CFA this paper tests and finds support for the hypothesis that there are three voice complaint behaviours: complaints direct to seller, complaints to friends and family and finally complaints to a third party. The results of this paper suggest that complaining behaviour should not be measured uni dimensionally. Considering complaining behaviour as one thing reduces richness of explanation and, hence, marketers ability to manage the different types of complaining behaviour. This paper also finds support for research that customers in competitive industries such as insurance are more likely to voice complaints directly to the company or to a third party. Measuring three types of complaining behaviour will provide more guidance for marketers seeking to reduce some types of voice complaint behaviours while promoting other types of voice complaint behaviours. Insurance marketers should seek to encourage complaints direct to the insurance company rather than to third parties where complaints could potentially be more harmful to the insurers reputation.
View less >
View more >This paper examines three competing views on the dimensionality of complaining behaviour. Some researchers have measured voice complaint behaviour with one dimension while other researchers have used between two and three dimensions when measuring voice complaint behaviour. Using first-order CFA this paper tests and finds support for the hypothesis that there are three voice complaint behaviours: complaints direct to seller, complaints to friends and family and finally complaints to a third party. The results of this paper suggest that complaining behaviour should not be measured uni dimensionally. Considering complaining behaviour as one thing reduces richness of explanation and, hence, marketers ability to manage the different types of complaining behaviour. This paper also finds support for research that customers in competitive industries such as insurance are more likely to voice complaints directly to the company or to a third party. Measuring three types of complaining behaviour will provide more guidance for marketers seeking to reduce some types of voice complaint behaviours while promoting other types of voice complaint behaviours. Insurance marketers should seek to encourage complaints direct to the insurance company rather than to third parties where complaints could potentially be more harmful to the insurers reputation.
View less >
Conference Title
ANZMAC 2004 Marketing Accountabilities and Responsibilities. Proceedings.
Publisher URI
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2004. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this conference please refer to the conference’s website or contact the author(s).