Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorG. Large, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorAshton, Rodericken_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Annaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T13:35:52Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T13:35:52Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.date.modified2010-07-27T07:18:33Z
dc.identifier.issn07498047en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10072/25507
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study examined the releability of the three-cluster model for chronic low back pain patients found using the Integrated Psychosocial Assessment Model(IPAM). A replivation stydy using a sample of patients from a different country was completed. Patients: Seven paitients (average age + 47.05 years.SD= 16.11) with chronic low back pain of noncancer origin participated in the study. Sixty-two of these patients were attending The Auckland New Zealand Regional Pain Service, while a further eight were attending a private practice painm service in Auckland. Outcome Measures: Subjects were assessed on the IPAM, which measures pain intensity, disability, coping straategies, attitudes towards and beliefs about pain, depressionand illness behaviour, the Medical Examination and Deagnostic InformatinCoding System. and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Results: Cluster anlysis using the k-means algorithm were performed on the IPAM data. The three-cluster solutions was preferred according to both the Variance Ratio Criterion and cluster imterpretability. Two of the three clusters correlated highly withclusters retrieved in the original study (r=0.78, r=0.71), while the third cluster showed partial resemblance (correlatonof r=0.31), Clusters were named " In Control," "Depressed and Disabled," and "High Deniers and Somatizaisers." No differences were found on the physical pathology scores between clusters. Decisionrules for cluster assignation resulted in 68% of the sample being correctly assigned. Conclusion: Support for this cluster model from two countries suggests its value in providing a multidimensional picture of patients with chronic low back pain. The possibility of using such cluster groups for detrmining treatment type is discusseden_US
dc.description.peerreviewedYesen_US
dc.description.publicationstatusYesen_AU
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.publisher.placeUSAen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/Abstract/1995/12000/A_New_Zealand_Replication_of_the_IPAM_Clustering.7.aspxen_US
dc.relation.ispartofpagefrom296en_US
dc.relation.ispartofpageto306en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalClinical Journal of Painen_US
dc.relation.ispartofvolume11en_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESen_US
dc.subject.fieldofresearchcode110000en_US
dc.titleA New Zealand Replication of the IPAM Clustering Model for Low Back Patientsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.descriptionC1 - Peer Reviewed (HERDC)en_US
dc.type.codeC - Journal Articlesen_US
gro.facultyGriffith Sciences, Griffith Institute for Drug Discoveryen_US
gro.rights.copyrightCopyright 1995 Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please use the hypertext link above to access the journal's website or contact the author for more information.en_AU
gro.date.issued1995
gro.hasfulltextNo Full Text


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal articles
    Contains articles published by Griffith authors in scholarly journals.

Show simple item record